Specialization :
Specialization is a type of academic arguement where, either speaker has more knowledge than the other in a particular subject. For example; two scholars are argueing about World War 2, one of the speakers has a masters in Foreign wars, and specifically has more knowledge about World War 2. This speaker has a specialization in the subject being discussed. The downfalls in this, is that because the speaker has a plethora of knowledge in the subject, he/she may be less open to new opinions about it.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Workshop 1 -expertise and interests
Expertise:
1. Automobile knowledge
2. Politics
3. Music
4. Skateboarding
5. Band Management
6. dating really stuck up women
Interested in:
1. Guitar
2. Drums
3. politics
4. Movies
5. real estate
6. International travel
7. European cars
8. "Muscle" cars
1. Automobile knowledge
2. Politics
3. Music
4. Skateboarding
5. Band Management
6. dating really stuck up women
Interested in:
1. Guitar
2. Drums
3. politics
4. Movies
5. real estate
6. International travel
7. European cars
8. "Muscle" cars
Entry #2
The Claim present in the article provided in journal entry #1 was a claim of fact. The data was that our governement was covering up a conspiracy about 9/11. It based this off the grounds that we did not know why we were attacked that day, and we needed a reason to go to war in the Middle East. It was backed by a poll that said 1/3 of Americans believed this theory. It rebuttled it's arguement saying that the president's father had started a war in the middle east and this could be him working through his son's administration to finish the war that he had started over oil.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Journal Entry #1
http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll
The claim being made in this article is that the US government may be at fault for the terrorist attacks on 9/11. This claim is being backed up by a poll that says 1/3 of Americans believe that our government created these attacks in order to go to war in the Middle-East. The controversial claim being made in this article is a claim of fact. The author also brought up several other American Government conspiracy theories in order to make his claim more believable. He also used a poll to show that a large percentage of Americans believed this theory to be true. I feel that this conspiracy theory in particular is absurd.
The claim being made in this article is that the US government may be at fault for the terrorist attacks on 9/11. This claim is being backed up by a poll that says 1/3 of Americans believe that our government created these attacks in order to go to war in the Middle-East. The controversial claim being made in this article is a claim of fact. The author also brought up several other American Government conspiracy theories in order to make his claim more believable. He also used a poll to show that a large percentage of Americans believed this theory to be true. I feel that this conspiracy theory in particular is absurd.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)